Los linajes biológicos como individuos
Resumen
Biological lineages as individuals.
The thesis according to which, in evolutionary biology, species are thought as individual entities is discussed here pointing to three particular questions: the supposition that individuals are always entities able to be spatially localized; the characterization of the nature of the processes to which taxa, being individual entities, are submitted, and the need of a clear distinction between two types of individual entities: the lineages and the systems. We also make comparisons between the Darwinian way of understanding species and the way in which Buffon understood them, and between the Darwinian genealogical taxonomy and the typological taxonomy proposed by Cuvier.
Key words: Genealogy, individuals, lineages, natural kinds, species, systems, typology.
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Agassiz, L. (1857), “Essay on classification”, in Agassiz, L., Contributions to the Natural History of the United States of America Vol. I. Boston: Little, Brown & co., pags.2-232.
Amundson, R. (2005), The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Appel, T. (1987), The Cuvier-Geoffroy Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bowler, P. (1996), Life’s Splendid Drama. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Bowler, P. (1998), Historia Fontana de las ciencias ambientales. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Brandon, R. y Mishler, B. (1996), “Individuality, pluralism, and phylogenetic species concept”, in Brandon, R. Concepts and Methods in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 106-123.
Buffon, G. (1761), Histoire Naturelle Générale et Particulière, Tome IX. Paris: L‘Imprimerie Royale.
Buffon, G. (1775), Histoire Naturelle Générale et Particulière: Supplément, Tome II. Paris: L’Imprimerie Royale
Buffon, G. [1778] (1988), Les Époques de la Nature, édition critique de Jaques Roger. Paris: Mémoires du Muséum National de Histoire Naturelle.
Caponi, G. (1999), “O anti-naturalismo popperiano,” Reflexão 73: 40-52.
Caponi, G. (2008a), “La unidad de tipo en la Historia Natural de Buffon”. Revista Brasileira de Historia da Ciência 1(1): 6-11.
Caponi, G. (2008b), Georges Cuvier: un fisiólogo de museo. México: UNAM, Limusa.
Caponi, G. (2008c), “La biología evolucionaria del desarrollo como ciencia da causas remotas”, Signos Filosóficos 20 (10): 121-144.
Carnap, R. [1928] (2003), The Logical Structure of the World. Chicago: Open Court.
Cassirer, E. (1948), El problema del conocimiento en la filosofía y en la ciencia modernas IV: de la muerte de Hegel a nuestros días [1832-1932. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Chediak, K. (2005), “O problema da individuação na Biologia à luz da determinação da unidade de seleção natural”, Scientiae Studia 3 (1): 65-78.
Crowson, R. (1966), “Darwin y la clasificación”, in Barnett, S. (ed.) Un siglo después de Darwin, Vol. 2. Madrid: Alianza, pp. 27-59.
Cuvier, G. (1817a), Le Règne Animal, Tome I. Paris: Deterville.
Darwin, C. (1859), On the Origin of Species. London: Murray.
Dos Santos, C. (2008), “Os dinossauros de Hennig: sobre a importância do monofiletismo para a sistemática biológica”, Scientiae Studia 6 (2): 179-200.
Driesch, H. (1908), The Science and Philosophy of Organism. London: A. & C. Black.
Eldredge, N. (1985), Unfinished Synthesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eldredge, N. (1995), Reinventing Darwin. London: Phoenix.
Ereshefsky, M. (2001), The Poverty of the Linnaean Hierarchy: a Philosophical Study of Biological Taxonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ereshefsky, M. (2007): “Species, taxonomy, and systematics”, in Mauthen, M. & Stephens, C. (eds.) Philosophy of Biology. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 403-428.
Ereshefsky, M. (2008): “Systematics and taxonomy”, in Sarkar, S. & Plutynski, A. (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 99-118.
Foucault, M. [1969] (1994), “La situation de Cuvier dans l’histoire de la biologie”, in Foucault, M. Dits et Écrits II: 1970-1975. París: Gallimard, pp. 30-66.
Gayon, J. (1992), “La individualité de la espèce: une thèse transformiste?”, in Gayon, J. (ed.) Buffon 88. Paris: Vrin, pp. 475-490.
Ghiselin, M. (1974), “A radical solution to the species problem”, Systematic Zoology 23: 536-544.
Ghiselin, M. (1983), El Triunfo de Darwin. Madrid: Cátedra.
Ghiselin, M. (1997), Metaphysics and the Origin of Species. Albany: SUNY Press.
Goodman, N. [1955](1965), Fact, Fiction and Forecast. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merril, pags.31-58.
Goodwin, B. (1998a), Las manchas del leopardo, Barcelona: Tusquets.
Goodwin, B. (1998b), “Forma y transformación: la lógica del cambio evolutivo”, in Wagensberg, J. & Agustí, J. (eds.) El progreso: un concepto acabado o emergente. Barcelona: Tusquets, pp. 137-168.
Gould, S. (2002), The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University press.
Guillo, D. (2003), Les figures de l’organisation. Paris: PUF.
Hennig, W. (1968), Elementos de una sistemática filogenética. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.
Hull, D. [1978] (1994), “A matter of individuality”, in Sober, E. (ed.) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 193-217.
Hull, D. (1980), “Individuality and selection”. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 311-332.
Hull, D. (1981), “Units of evolution: a metaphysical essay”, in Brandon, R. & Burian, R. (eds.) Genes, Organisms and Populations. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 142-160.
Hull, D. (1984), “Historical entities and historical narratives”, in Hookway, C. (ed.) Minds, Machines and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 17-42.
Hull, D. (1987), “Genealogical actors in ecological roles”, Biology & Philosophy 2: 168-184.
Hull, D. (1992), “Individuals”, in Keller, E. & Lloyd, E. (eds.) Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 180-187.
Hull, D. (1998a), “Sujetos centrales y narraciones históricas”, in Martínez, S. & Barahona, A. (eds.) Historia y explicación en biología. México: FCE, pp. 247-274.
Hull, D. (1998b), “A clash of paradigms or the sound of one hand clapping”, ñBiology & Philosophy 13: 558-595.
Hull, D. (1967), “The metaphysics of evolution”, British Journal for the History of Science 3: 309-337.
Hull, D. (2001), Science and Selection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Margulis, L. & Schwartz, K. (2001), Cinco reinos. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara.
Mariconda, P. (2008), “As mecânicas de Galileu: as máquinas simples e a perspectiva técnica moderna”, Scientiae Studia 6 (4): 565-606.
Mayr, E. (1976), “Typological vs population thinking”, in Mayr, E. Evolution and Diversity of Life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 26-29
Mayr, E. (1988), “The ontology of the species taxon”, in Mayr E. Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 335-358.
Mayr, E. (1999),Systematics and the Origin of Species From the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
O’Brien, M. y Lyman, L. (2002), Applying Evolutionary Archaeology. New York: Kluwer.
Papavero, N. y Llorente-Bousquets, J. (1994), Principia Taxonomica, Vol. IV. México: UNAM.
Popper, K. [1958] (1962), “Universales, disposiciones y necesidad natural o física”, apéndice de Popper, K., La lógica de la investigación científica. Madrid: Tecnos, pags.392-411.
Popper, K. (1984), El universo abierto: un argumento a favor del determinismo (Vol.III del Post Scriptum a La Lógica de la investigación científica). Madrid: Tecnos.
Quine W. (1980), “Espécies naturais’, in Ryle, Strawson, Austin, Quine (Coleção Os Pensadores). São Paulo: Abril, pp. 134-156.
Rosemberg, A. & McShea, D. (2008), Philosophy of Biology. New York: Routledge.
Ruse, M. (1987), “Biological species: natural kinds, individuals, or what?”, The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 38 (2): 225-242.
Ruse, M. (2009), Charles Darwin. Buenos Aires: Katz.
Schleicher, A. [1868] (1980), “La theorie de Darwin et la science du langage”, apéndice de Tort, P. Evolutionnisme et linguistique. Paris: Vrin, pp. 59-78.
Simpson, G. (1970), “La ciencia histórica”, in Albritton, C. (ed.) Filosofía de la geología. México: Compañía Editorial Continental, pp. 39-70.
Soabi, M. (2009), “Realism and artifact kina”, in Krohs, U. & Kroes, P. (eds.) Functions in Biological and Artificial Worlds. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 185-202.
Solanet, E. (1955), Pelajes criollos. Buenos Aires: Kraft.
Sober, E. (1992), “Monophily”, in Keller, E. & Lloyd, E. (eds.) Keywords in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 202-219.
Sober, E. (1993), Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sober, E. (2003), “Metaphysical and epistemological issues in modern Darwinian theory”, in Hodge, J. & Radick, G. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 267-288.
Stamos, D. (2007), Darwin and the Nature of Species. Albany: SUNY Press.
Steadman, P. (1982), Arquitectura y naturaleza: las analogías biológicas en el diseño (trad. de The evolution of design). Madrid: Blume.
Sterelny, K. & Griffiths, P. (1999), Sex and Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tort, P. (1980), Evolutionnisme et linguistique. Paris: Vrin.
Toulmin, S. (1977), La comprensión humana. Madrid, Alianza.
Webster, G. y Goodwin, B. (1996), Form and Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wiley, E. (1980), “Is the evolutionary species fiction?”. Systematic Zoology 29: 76-80.
Wiley, E. (1981), Phylogenetics. New York: Wiley & Sons.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787