Amundson, R. (2005), The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Amundson, R. & Lauder G. V. (1994), “Function without purpose,” Biology and Philosophy 9 (4): 443-469.

Appel, T.A. (1987), The Cuvier-Geoffory Debate: French Biology in the Decades Before Darwin. New York: Oxford University Press.

Ariew A. (2003), “Ernst Mayr’s ‘ultimate/proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed,” Biology and Philosophy 18: 553–565.

Ariew, A., Cummins, R. & Perlman, M. (eds.) (2002), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Asma, S. T. (1996a), “Darwin’s causal pluralism,” Biology and Philosophy 11: 1–20.

Asma, S. T. (1996b), Following Form and Function: A Philosophical Archaeology of Life Science. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Beatty, J. (1995), “The evolutionary contingency thesis,” in Wolters, G.& Lennox, J. (eds.), Concepts, Theories and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. The Second Pittsburgh-Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Biology. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 45-81.

Bechtel, W. & Richardson R. C. (1993), Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Beckermann, A. (1992), Emergence or Reduction?: Essays on the Prospects of Non-reductive Physicalism. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Brandon, R. (1997), “Does biology have laws: the experimental evidence,” Philosophy of Science 64: S444–S458.

Broad, C. D. (1951), The Mind and Its Place in Nature. London: Routledge.

Carroll, R. L. (2000), “Towards a new evolutionary synthesis,” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15 (1): 27-32.

Cartwright, N. (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Coleman, W. (1971), Biology in the Nineteenth Century: Problems of Form, Function, and Transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press

Cornish Bowden, A. (2007), “Beyond reductionism: Metabolic circularity as a guiding vision for a real biology of systems,” Proteomics 7(6): 839-845.

Craver, C. (2001), “Role functions, mechanisms, and hierarchy,” Philosophy of Science 68(1): 53-74.

Craver, C. (2007a), “Constitutive explanatory relevance,” Journal of Philosophical Research 32: 3-20.

Craver, C. (2007b), Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cummins, R. (1975), “Functional analysis,” The Journal of Philosophy 72(20): 741765.

Cuvier, G. (1817), Le Règne Animal Distribué d’après son Organisation Pour Servir de Base à l’Histoire Naturelle des Animaux. Vol. 1. Brussels: Louis Hauman et compaigne, libraires-éditeurs.

Emmeche, C. and Hoffmeyer, J. (1991), “From language to nature: The semiotic metaphor in biology,” Semiotica 84 (1/2), 1-42.

Falconer, D. S. & Mackay. F. C. (1996), Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Harlow, UK: Longman.

Gayon, J. (1995), “Neo-Darwinism,” in Wolters, G. & Lennox, J. (eds.), Concepts, Theories and Rationality in the Biological Sciences. The second Pittsburgh-Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Biology. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 1-25.

Glennan, S. (1996), “Mechanisms and the nature of causation,” Erkenntnis 44(1): 49.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (1994), “A modern history theory of functions ,” Noûs 28(3): 344-362.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (1998), Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gould, S. J. (1977), “Eternal metaphors of palaeontology,” in Hallam A. (ed.), Patterns of Evolution. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 1–26.

Gould, S. J. (1980), “Is a new and general theory of evolution emerging?”, Paleobiology 6: 119-130.

Gould, S. J. & Lewontin, R. C. (1979), “The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 205(1161): 581-598. Grene, M. & Depew, D. (2004), The Philosophy of Biology: an Episodic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Griffiths, P. (2009), “In what sense does ‘Nothing make sense except in the light of evolution’?,” Acta Biotheoretica 57(1): 11-32.

Hasegawa, A. (2009), “Optical soliton in dielectric fibres and self-organization of turbulence in plasmas in magnetic fields,” Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Ser. B 85 (1): 1-11.

Hull, D. L. (1989), The Metaphysics of Evolution. Albany, NY.: SUNY Press.

Kant, I. (1907), Critique of Pure Reason : In Commemoration of the Centenary of its First Publication. London: The McMillan Company.

Kauffman, S. (1993), The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kleisner, K. (2007). “The formation of the theory of homology in biological sciences,” Acta Biotheoretica 55: 317–340.

Kutschera, U. & Niklas, K. J. (2004), “The modern theory of biological evolution: an expanded synthesis,” Naturwissenschaften 91(6): 255-76.

Levins, R., and Lewontin R. (1985), The Dialectical Biologist. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lewis, M.D. (2000), “Emotional self-organization at three time scales,” in Lewis, M.D. & Granic, I. (eds.), Emotion, Development, and Self-Organization. Cambridge University Press, pp. 37–69.

Love, A. C. (2003), “Evolutionary morphology, innovation, and the synthesis of evolutionary and developmental biology,” Biology and Philosophy 18(2): 309345.

Machamer, P., Darden, L. & Craver, C. F. (2000), “Thinking about mechanisms,” Philosophy of Science 67(1): 1-25.

McLaughlin, P. (2001), What Functions Explain : Functional Explanation & Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Mayr, E. (1961), “Cause and effect in biology,” Science 134:1501–506.

Mayr, E. (1982), The Growth of Biological Thought: Diversity, Evolution, and Inheritance. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

Mayr, E. (1985), “How biology differs from the physical sciences,” in Depew D. J. & Weber B. H. (eds.), Evolution at a Crossroads: The New Biology and the New Philosophy of science. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, pp. 43-63.

Mayr, E. (1988), Toward a New Philosophy of Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mayr, E. (2000), “Biology in the twenty-first century” BioScience, 50: 895-897.

Mayr, E. (2001), “The philosophical foundations of Darwinism,” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 145(4): 488-95.

Millikan, R. G. (1989), “In defense of proper functions,” Philosophy of Science 56(2): 288-302.

Mitchell, S. D. (2000), “Dimensions of scientific law,” Philosophy of Science 67(2): 242-265.

Müller, G. B. and Newman, S. A. (2005), “The innovation triad: An evo-devo agenda,” Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 304: 487-503.

Neander, K. (1991a), “The teleological notion of ’function,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 69(4): 454-468.

Neander, K. (1991b) “Functions as selected effects: the conceptual analyst’s defense,” Philosophy of Science 58(2): 168-184.

Newman, S. A. (2003), “The fall and rise of systems biology,” GeneWatch 16(4): 8-12.

Newman, S. A. & Bhat, R. (2009), “Dynamical patterning modules: a “pattern language” for development and evolution of multicellular form,” The International Journal of Developmental Biology 53: 693-705.

Newman, S. A. (2010), “Dynamical patterning modules,” in Pigluicci M. & Müller G.B. (eds.), Evolution—the Extended Synthesis. Cambridge Mass: The MIT Press, pp. 281-306.

Panchen, A. L. (2001), “Étienne Geoffroy St.-Hilaire: father of ‘evo-devo’?”, Evolution and Development 3: 41–46.

Perlman, M. (2004), “The modern philosophical resurrection of teleology,” The Monist 87(1): 3.

Piaget, J. (1971a), Biology and Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Piaget, J. (1971b), Structuralism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Pigliucci, M. (2009), “An extended synthesis for evolutionary biology,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1168(1): 218-28.

Pigliucci, M. & Müller, G. B. (eds.) (2010), Evolution—The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Pinto-Correia, C. (1997), The Ovary of Eve—Egg and Sperm and Preformationism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Pope, A. (1995), The Works of Alexander Pope. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Poetry Library.

Ramírez-Trejo, Luis. (2010) “Two functional approaches to anticipation in biology,” International Journal of Computing Anticipatory Systems (23): 86-93.

Rieppel, O. (1990), “Structuralism, functionalism, and the four Aristotelian causes,” Journal of the History of Biology 23 (2): 291-320.

Rieppel, O. (1994), “Homology, topology, and typology: the history of modern debates,” in Hall, B.K. (ed.), Homology, the Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 63-100.

Rose, M. & Oakley, T. (2007), “The new biology: beyond the Modern Synthesis,” Biology Direct 2(1): 30.

Rosen, R. (1991), Life Itself: a Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life. New York: Columbia University Press.

Rueger, A. (2000), “Physical emergence, diachronic and synchronic,” Synthese 124(3): 297.

Russell, E. S. (1916), Form and Function: A Contribution to the History of Animal Morphology. London: John Murray.

Sarkar S. (1998), Genetics and Reductionism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Scholtz ,G (2010), “Deconstructing morphology,” Acta Zoologica 91: 44–63.

Seifritz, W. (2005), “The self-criticality problem of any new CO2-free energy system replacing fossil fuels,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 30: 45-51.

Shimony, A. (1987), “The methodology of synthesis: parts and wholes in lowenergy physics,” in Kargon, R. and Achinstein, P. (eds.), Kelvin’s Baltimore Lectures and Modern Theoretical Physics. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 399-423.

Van Speybroeck, L.; Van de Vijver, G. and De Waele, D. (2002), “Theories in early embryology. Close connections between epigenesis, preformationis, and selforganization,” in Van Speybroeck, L.; Van de Vijver, G. and De Waele, D. (eds). From Epigenesis to Epigenetics: The Genome in Context. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 981, pp. 7–50.

Walsh, D. M. (1996), “A taxonomy of functions,” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26(4): 493-514.

Weber, M. (2005), Philosophy of Experimental Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Weber, A. and Varela, F. J. (2002), “Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality,” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 97–125.

Webster, G. and Goodwin, B. (1996), Form and Transformation; Generative and Relational Principles in Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wouters, A. (2003), “Four notions of biological function,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Biological and Biomedical Sciences 34(4): 633-668.

Wouters, A. (2005a), “The functional perspective of organismal biology,” in Reydon, T. A. C. & Hemerik, L. (eds.), Current Themes in Theoretical Biology. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 33-69.

Wouters, A. (2005b), “The function debate in philosophy,” Acta Biotheoretica 53(2): 123-151.

Wouters, A. (2007), “Design explanation: determining the constraints on what can be alive,” Erkenntnis 67(1): 65-80.