Controversies over the evolutionary role of paranasal sinus pneumatization in humans and neanderthals as an adaptation to extreme cold
Resumen
In this paper, we examine a case of scientific controversy over the evolving role of the paranasal sinuses, comparing Neanderthals and humans by analyzing two rival hypotheses. The first hypothesis states that the paranasal sinuses do not represent an adaptation to extreme cold, while the second claims the contrary. The two articles partially use the same database and employ identical methodologies and evolutionary theoretical assumptions. This example is interesting because, in terms of Nudler’s concepts of controversial and non-controversial spaces, the problem lies in the latter, i.e., the biases of the two articles and their mistakes. Our paper highlights the misunderstandings that can arise when an attempt is made to analyze a complex structure from an evolutionary perspective using two-dimensional analytical techniques, that is to say, explaining a trait in isolation and, consequently, losing an integrated approach to the organism and its multiple interactions with the environment.
Key words: Scientific controversy, paranasal sinuses, Neanderthals, humans, complex systems, modularity, controversial spaces, methodologies, evolutionary explanations, philosophy of biology.
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Bignon, F. (1889), “Contribution a l’étude de la pneumaticité chez les oiseaux. Les cellules aëriennes cervico-céphalique des oiseaux et leurs rapports avec les os de la tête”, Mémoires de la Société Zoolologique de France 2: 260–320.
Blanton, P. L., Biggs, N. L. (1969), “Eighteen hundred years of controversy: the paranasal sinuses,” Am J Anat 124: 135–148.
Dascal, M. (1995), “Epistemología, controversias y pragmática”, Isegoría 12: 8-43.
Dascal, M. (1998), “The study of controversies and the theory and history of science,” (2): 147-154.
Fondon, J. W., Gadner, H. R. (2004), “Molecular origins of rapid and continuous morphological evolution,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 18058-18063.
García, R. (2006), Sistemas complejos: conceptos, método y fundamentación epistemológica de la investigación interdisciplinaria. España: Gedisa.
Haberland, M., Mokalled, M. H., Montgomery, R. L., Olson, E. L. (2009), “Epigenetic control of skull morphogenesis by histone deacetylase 8”, Genes & Development 23: 1625–1630.
Hill, C.A. (2008), “Evolutionary and developmental history of temporal bone pneumatization in hominids”, Ph.D. dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.
Holton, N. E., Franciscus, R. G. (2008), “The paradox of a wide nasal aperture in cold-adapted Neandertals: a causal assessment”, J. Hum. Evol. 55: 942–951.
Holton, N .E, Yokley, T. R., Franciscus, R .G. (2011), “Climatic adaptation and Neandertal facial evolution: A comment on Rae et al. (2011)”, J. Hum. Evol. 63: 624-627.
Lamas, S. G., Dressino, V. (2010), “Los espacios controversiales y la refocalización, el modelo de Nudler en la biología actual”, en Resúmenes del XV Congreso Nacional de Filosofía, p. 150.
Laudan, L. (1977), Progress and its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Márquez, S. (2008), “The paranasal sinuses: the last frontier in craniofacial biology”, Anat Rec. 261: 1350–1361.
McMullin, E. (1987), “Scientific controversy and its termination,” in H. Jr. Tristram Engelhardt, A.L. Caplan (eds), Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 49-91.
Nudler, O. (2001), “Is there progress in philosophy? A Russellian view”, Principia 5: 241-252.
Nudler, O. (2002), “Campos controversiales y progreso en filosofía”, Manuscrito 25 (2): 337-352.
Nudler, O. (2009), “Los espacios controversiales: la naturaleza dialéctica del cambio en las ciencias y la filosofía”, en O. Nudler (ed.), Espacios controversiales: Hacia un modelo de cambio filosófico y científico. Buenos Aires: Miño y Dávila, pp: 21-48.
Paulli S. (1900), “Über die pneumaticität des Schädels bei den Säugethieren. Eine morphologische Studie III. Über die Morphologie des Siebbeins und Pneumaticität bei den Insectivoren, Hyracoideen, Chiropteren, Carnivoren, Pinnipedien, Edentates, Rodentiern, Prosimien und Primaten. Gegenbaurs”, Morph Jahrb 28: 483–564.
Rae, T.C., Koppe, T., Stringer, C.B. (2011), “The Neanderthal face is not cold adapted”, J. Hum. Evol. 60: 234-239.
Tillier, A.M. (1977), “La pneumatization du massif cranio-facial chez les homes actuels et fossils (suite)”, Bull Et Mem.de la Soc D’Anthrop de Paris 4: 287–316.
Tristram Engelhardt, H. Jr.; Caplan, A. L. (1987), “Patterns of controversy and closure: the imterplay of knowledge, values and political forces,” in H. Jr. Tristram Engelhardt, A. L. Caplan (eds.), Scientific Controversies: Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1-24.
Trut, L. N. (1989), “Early canid domestication: the farm fox experiment,” Am. Scientist 87: 160–165.
Weidenreich F. (1924), “Über die pneumatischen Nebenräume des Kopfes. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis des Bauprinzips des Knochens, des Schädels und des Körpers (Knochenstudien: III. Teil)”, Z Anat Entwickl Gesch 72: 55–93.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787