Enfoques postcognitivistas: rótulos, presupuestos y posibles lecturas

María Inés Silenzi

Resumen


Postcognitivist standpoints: labels, suppositions and possible lectures

Whereas once the conflict within cognitive science was between connectionism and cognitive approach, today “the struggle of fashion” is from the classical and “postcognitivist” approaches to cognition. These “new” approaches to cognitive science, to which we restrict ourselves in this work, agree in rejecting, totally or partially, the classical approach, and call for the necessity to pay attention to aspects that the classical approach has not sufficiently addressed. In this paper we review critically, with the support in the literature, the various labels that refer to what we call postcognitivist approaches and some of its basic postulates through two possible readings, metaphysical and methodological. The objective of this work is not to describe each of the postcognitivists stances separately, but to provide an overview of the current situation within the cognitive sciences.

Key words. Cognitive sciences, postcognitives standpoints, embedded cognition, enacted cognition, extended cognition, distributed cognition, affective cognition, metaphysical approach, methodological approach.

 


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Anderson, M. L. (2003), “Embodied cognition: A field guide,” Artificial Intelligence 149: 91-130.

Anderson M. L. y Lebiere, C. (2003), “Optimism for the future of unified theories”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5): 628-633.

Clark, A. (1997), Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Clark, A. (1998), “Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition”, in Bechtel, W. y Graham, G. (eds.), A Companion to Cognitive Science. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 506-517.

Clark, A. (2001), Mind Ware: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science. New York: Oxford University Press.

Clark, A. (2008), Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. New York: Oxford University Press.

Clark, A. y Chalmers, D. (1998), “The extended mind”, Analysis 58: 7-19.

Colombetti, G. (2010), “Enaction, sense-making and emotion”, in Gapenne, S. J. y Paolo, O. E. D. (eds.), Enaction: Toward a New Paradigm for Cognitive Science. Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 145-164.

Colombetti, G. y Thompson, E. (2008), “The feeling body: towards an inactive approach to emotion”, in Overton, W. F., Muller, U. y Newman, J. L. (eds.), Developmental Perspectives on Embodiment and Consciousness. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass., pp. 45-68.

Dokic, J. (2006), “from linguistic contextualism to situated cognition: The case of ad hoc concepts”, Philosophical Psychology 19 (3): 309-328.

Gallagher, S. (2005), How the Body Shapes the Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gallagher, S. (2010), “Philosophical antecedents to situated cognition”, in Robbins, P. y Aydede, M. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 35-51.

Gardner, H. (1987), La nueva ciencia de la mente: historia de la revolución cognitiva. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Gomila, A. (2008), “Mending or abandoning cognitivism”, in Vega, M., Glendberbg, A. y Grasser, A. (eds.), Symbols and Embodiement. Debates on Mining and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 789-834.

Gomila, A. y Calvo Garzón, F. (2008), Handbook of Cognitive Science. Direction for an Embodied Cognitive Science: Towards an Integrated Approach. Oxford: Elsevier.

Haugeland, J. (1998), “Mind embodied and embedded”, in Haugeland, J. (ed.), Having Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hollan, J., Hutchins, E. y Kirsh, D. (2000), “Distributed cognition: Toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research”, ACM: Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions 7: 174-196.

Hurley, S. L. (1998), Consciousness in Action. London: Harvard University Press.

Marsh, L. y Onof, C. (2008), “Introduction to the special issue: Perspectives on social cognition”, Systems Research 9: 1-4.

Noë, A. (2004), Action in Perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Robbins, P. y Aydede, M. (eds.) (2008), Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rowlands, M. (2010), The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Rupert, R. (2010), Cognitive Systems and the Extended Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

Shapiro, L. (2011), Embodied Cognition. New York: Routledge Press.

Thagard, P. (2008), La mente: introducción a las ciencias cognitivas. Buenos Aires: Katz.

Thompson, E. (2007), Mind in Life Biology, Phenomenology and the Sciences of Mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Varela, F. (1990), Conocer: las ciencias cognitivas, tendencias y perspectivas. Barcelona: Gedisa.

Varela, F., Thompson, E. y Rosch, E. (1991), The Embodied Mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Vega Encabo, J. (2005), “Mentes híbridas: Cognición, representaciones externas y artefactos epistémicos”, Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana Extraordinario-AIBR (Asoc. Antropólogos Iberoamericanos en Red), Núm. Esp. noviembre-diciembre, 2005: 1-37.

Walmsley, J. (2008), “Methodological situatedness, or DEEDS worth doing and pursuing”, Cognitive Systems Research 9: 150-159.

White, C., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M. y McKoon, G. (2009), “Dysphoria and memory for emotional material: A diffusion model analysis”, Cognition and Emotion 23: 181-205.

Wilson, M. (2002), “Six views of embodied cognition”, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9: 625-636.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.

Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787