El realismo científico y los milagros inesperados

Christian C. Carman

Resumen


Scientific Realism and unexpected mirades.

One of the main arguments in favor of scientific realism is the one called “No-Miracle” Argument. Accordingly, scientific success would be a miracle without a realist explanation. The argument possesses an undeniable intuitive force, counteracted however by a counter-argument, persuasive by its simplicity: There are unexpected miracles, and there are many. This is exactly what the famous Laudan’s pessimistic meta-induction tries to show. Different strategies have been developed to impede Laudan’s argument. One of them points out that it is not true that the already abandoned past theories are simply false, nor that their theoretical terms lack real reference. This last path, in which Psillos, Worrall and Kitcher are occupied, faces serious difficulties since it can be easily accused of falling in circularities. This paper analyzes these objections and tries to show their real scope.

 

Key words: Scientific Realism, Anti-realism, pessimistic meta-induction, divide et impera, reference, truth, no-miracle argument.

 


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Boyd, R. (1984), “The current status of scientific realism,” in Leplin (1984), pp. 41-82.

Devitt, M. (1991), Realism and Truth, Princeton: Princeton University Press (second edition, first edition: 1984).

Hardin, C. & A. Rosenberg (1982), “In defense of Convergent Realism”, Philosophy of Science 49: 604-615.

Fine, A. (1984), “The natural ontological attitude,” in Leplin (1984), pp. 83-107.

Kitcher, P. (1982), “Genes,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33: 337-359.

Kitcher, P. (2001), “Real realism: The Galilean strategy,” The Philosophical Review 111: 151-197.

Kitcher, P. ([1993] 2001), El avance de la ciencia. Ciencia sin leyenda, objetividad sin ilusiones. Traducción de Héctor Islas y Laura Manríquez. México, D.F.: UNAM. Publicado originalmente como The Advancement of Science (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

Laudan, L. (1981), “A confutation of convergent realism,” in Leplin (1984) (publicado originalmente en Philososphy of Science Vol. 48, No. 1, 1981).

Laudan, L. (1984), “Realism without the real,” Philosophy of Science 51: 156-162.

Leplin, J. (1984), Scientific Realism, Berkeley: University of California Press.

Leplin, J. (1997), A Novel Defence of Scientific Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lewis, P. J. (2001), “Why the pessimistic induction is a fallacy,” Synthese 129: 371-380.

Magnus, P.D. y Callender, Craig, (2004), “Realist ennui and the base rate fallacy,” Philosophy of Science 71: 320-338.

Matheson, C. (1998), “Why the no-miracles argument fails,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 12: 263-279.

McMullin, E. (1984), “A case for scientific realism,” in Leplin (1984), pp. 8-40.

Psillos, S. (1999), Scientific Realism. How Science Tracks Truth, London and New York: Routledge.

Psillos, S. (1996), “Scientific realism and the ‘pessimistic induction’,” Philosophy of Science 63 (Proceedings): s306-s314.

Putnam, H. (1984), “What is Realism?” in Leplin (1984), pp. 140-153. Una versión ampliada puede encontrarse en la segunda y la primera parte de la tercera conferencia de Putnam ([1978]1991).

Stanford, P.K. (2003), “No refuge for realism: selective confirmation and the history of science,” Philosophy of Science 70: 913-925.

van Fraassen, Bas C. ([1980] 1996), La imagen científica. México: Paidós. Traducción de Sergio Martínez. Publicado originalmente como The Scientific Image, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Worrall, J. (1994), “How to remain (reasonably) optimistic: scientific realism and the “’luminiferous ether’,” in D. Hull, M. Forbes and R. M. Burian (eds.), PSA 1994, Vol. 1, East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.

Worrall, J. (1989), “Structural realism: the best of both worlds?”, Dialectica 43, 1-2: 99-124.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano
de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.

Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787