Impacto del contorno en los juicios estéticos y en las decisiones de acercamiento-rechazo en arquitectura

Oshin Vartanian

Resumen


Impact of contour on aesthetic judgment and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture

On average, we urban dwellers spend about 90% of our time indoors, and share the intuition that the physical features of the places we live and work in influence how we feel and act. However, there is surprisingly little research on how architecture impacts behavior, much less on how it influences brain function. To begin closing this gap, we conducted a functional magnetic resonance imaging study to examine how systematic variation in contour impacts aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions, outcome measures of interest to both architects and users of spaces alike. As predicted, participants were more likely to judge spaces as beautiful if they were curvilinear than rectilinear. Neuroanatomically, when contemplating beauty, curvilinear contour activated the anterior cingulate cortex exclusively, a region strongly responsive to the reward properties and emotional salience of objects. Complementing this finding, pleasantness—the valence dimension of the affect circumplex—accounted for nearly 60% of the variance in beauty ratings. Furthermore, activation in a distributed brain network known to underlie the aesthetic evaluation of different types of visual stimuli covaried with beauty ratings. In contrast, contour did not affect approach-avoidance decisions, although curvilinear spaces activated the visual cortex. The results suggest that the well-established effect of contour on aesthetic preference can be extended to architecture. Furthermore, the combination of our behavioral and neural evidence underscores the role of emotion in our preference for curvilinear objects in this domain.     

 

Key words: Neuroaesthetics, design, curvature, habitat theory.


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


Appleton, J. (1975/1996), The Experience of Landscape. JohnWiley and Sons: New York, NY.

Bar, M. y M. Neta (2006), “Humans prefer curved visual objects”, Psychol Sci 17(8): 645–648.

Bar, M. y M. Neta (2007), “Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation”, Neuropsychologia 45(10): 2191–2200.

Barrett, L. F. y T. Wager (2006), “The structure of emotion: Evidence from the neuroimaging of emotion”, Curr Dir Psychol Sci 15(2): 79–85.

Barrett, L. F., B. Mesquita, K. N. Ochsner y J. J. Gross (2007), “The experience of emotion”, Annu Rev Psychol 58: 373–403.

Berridge, K. C. (1995), “Food reward: Brain substartes of wanting and liking”, Neurosci Biobehav Rev 20(1): 1–25.

Berridge, K. C. y M. L. Kringelbach (2008), “Affective neuroscience of pleasure: Reward in humans and animals”, Psychopharmacology (Berl) 199(3): 457–480.

Brown, S., X. Gao, L. Tisdelle, S. B. Eickhoff y M. Liotti (2011), “Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities”, Neuroimage 58(1): 250–258.

Crammond, D. J. (1997), “Motor imagery: Never in your wildest dream”, Trends Neurosci 20(2): 54–57.

Chatterjee, A. (2011), “Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story”, J Cogn Neurosci 23(1): 53–62.

Chatterjee, A., A. Thomas, S. E. Smith y G. K. Aguirre (2009), “The neural response to facial attractiveness” Neuropsychology 23(2): 135–143.

Christoff, K., J. M. Ream, L. P. Geddes y J. D. Gabrieli (2003), “Evaluating self-generated information: Anterior prefrontal contributions to human cognition”, Behav Neurosci 117(6): 1161–1168.

Dazkir, S. S. y M. A. Read (2012), “Furniture forms and their influence on our emotional responses toward interior environments”, Environ Behav 44(5): 722–734.

Decety, J. (1996), “The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery”, Behav Brain Res 77(1–2): 45–52.

Deiber, M. P. et al. (1998), “Cerebral processes related to visuomotor imagery and generation of simple finger movements studied with positron emission tomography”, Neuroimage 7(2): 73–85.

Di Dio, C. y V. Gallese (2009), “Neuroaesthetics: A review”, Curr Opin Neurobiol 19: 1–6.

Di Dio, C., E. Macaluso y G. Rizzolatti (2007), “The golden beauty: Brain response to classical and renaissance sculptures”, PLoS ONE 2(11): e1201.

Fairhall, S. L. y A. Ishai (2008), “Neural correlates of object indeterminacy in art compositions”, Conscious Cogn 17(3): 923–932.

Forman, S. D. et al. (1995), “Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster-size threshold”, Magn Reson Med 33(5): 636–647.

Franz, G., M. von der Heyde y H. H. Bulthoff (2005), “An empirical approach to the experience of architectural space in virtual reality—Exploring relations between features and affective appraisals of rectangular indoor spaces”, Autom Construct 14(2): 165–172.

Goldstein, R. N. (2006), “Architectural design and the collaborative research environment”, Cell 127(2): 243–246.

Gordon, K. (1909), Esthetics. Henry Holt: New York.

Grush, R. (2004), “The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception”, Behav Brain Sci 27(3): 377–396, discusión 396–442.

Hanakawa, T., M. A. Dimyan y M. Hallett (2008), “Motor planning, imagery, and execution in the distributed motor network: A time-course study with functional MRI”, Cereb Cortex 18(12): 2775–2788.

Hekkert, P. y P. C. W. van Wieringen (1996), “The impact of level of expertise on the evaluation of original and altered versions of post-impressionistic paintings”, Acta Psychol (Amst) 94(2): 117–131.

Hevner, K. (1935), “Experimental studies of the affective value of colors and lines”, J Appl Psychol 19(4): 385–398.

Hildebrand, G. (1999), Origins of Architectural Pleasure. University of California Press: Berkeley, C. A.

Ishai, A. (2007), “Sex, beauty and the orbitofrontal cortex”, Int J Psychophysiol 63(2): 181–185.

Ishizu, T. y S. Zeki (2011), “Toward a brain-based theory of beauty”, PLoS ONE 6(7): e21852.

Jacobsen, T., R. I. Schubotz, L. Höfel y D. Y. Cramon (2006), “Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty”, Neuroimage 29(1): 276–285.

Jones, P. B. y E. Canniffe (2007), Modern Architecture Through Case Studies 1945– 1990. Architectural Press: Oxford.

Kaplan, S. (1987), “Aesthetics, affect, and cognition”, Environ Behav 19(1): 3–32.

Kaplan, S. (1992), “Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism", in The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture, in Barkow, J. H. L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (eds.). Oxford University Press: New York, pp. 581–598.

Kastl, A. J. e I. L. Child (1968), “Emotional meaning of four typographical variables”, J Appl Psychol 52(6): 440–446.

Kawabata, H. y S. Zeki (2004), “Neural correlates of beauty”, J Neurophysiol 91(4): 1699–1705.

Kellert, S. R. y E. O. Wilson (1993), The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press: Washington, D. C.

Kirk, U., M. Skov, M. S. Christensen y N. Nygaard (2009), “Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: A parametric fMRI study”, Brain Cogn 69(2): 306–315.

Klepeis, N. E. et al. (2001), “The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): A resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants”, J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol 11(3): 231–252.

Knutson, B. y S. M. Greer (2008), “Anticipatory affect: Neural correlates and consequences for choice”, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 363(1511): 3771– 3786.

Kringelbach, M. L. (2005), “The human orbitofrontal cortex: Linking reward to hedonic experience”, Nat Rev Neurosci 6(9): 691–702.

Kringelbach, M. L. y E. T. Rolls (2004), “The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: Evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology”, Prog Neurobiol 72(5): 341–372.

Le Corbusier (1948), Towards a New Architecture. Architectural Press: London, U. K.

Leder, H. y C. Carbon (2005), “Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design”, Appl Cogn Psychol 19(5): 603–618.

Leder, H., B. Belke, A. Oeberst y D. Augustin (2004), “A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments”, Br J Psychol 95(Pt 4): 489–508.

Leder, H., P. P. L. Tinio y M. Bar (2011), “Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects”, Perception 40(6): 649–655.

LeDoux, J. (1998), The Emotional Brain: The Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life. Touchstone: New York, N. Y.

Lieberman, M. D. y W. A. Cunningham (2009), “Type I and type II error concerns in fMRI research: Re-balancing the scale”, Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 4(4): 423– 428.

Lindal, P. J. y T. Hartig (2013), “Architectural variation, building height, and the restorative quality of urban residential streetscapes”, J Environ Psychol 33(1): 26–36.

Liu, X., J. Hairston, M. Schrier y J. Fan (2011), “Common and distinct networks underlying reward valence and processing stages: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies”, Neurosci Biobehav Rev 35(5): 1219–1236.

Lundholm, H. (1921), “The affective tone of lines: Experimental researches”, Psychol Rev 28(1): 43–60.

Marks, I. y R. Dar (2000), “Fear reduction by psychotherapies. Recent findings, future directions”. Br J Psychiatry 176: 507–511.

Meyers-Levy, J. y R. Zhu (2007), “The influence of ceiling height: The effect of priming on the type of processing that people use”, J Consum Res 34(2): 174–186.

Muller, M., L. Höfel, E. Brattico y T. Jacobsen (2010), “Aesthetic judgments of music in experts and laypersons—An ERP study”, Int J Psychophysiol 76(1): 40–51.

Murphy, F. C., I. Nimmo-Smith y A. D. Lawrence (2003), “Functional neuroanatomy of emotions: A meta-analysis”, Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 3(3): 207–233.

Nadal, M., E. Munar, M. A. Capó, J. Rosselló y C. J. Cela-Conde (2008), “Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference”, Spat Vis 21(3–5): 379–396.

Nasar, J. L. (1988), Environmental Aesthetics: Theory, Research, and Applications, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

Oldfield, R. C. (1971), “The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory”, Neuropsychologia 9(1): 97–113.

Olds, M. E. y J. L. Fobes (1981), “The central basis of motivation: Intracranial self-stimulation studies”, Annu Rev Psychol 32: 523–574.

Ott, W. R. (1989), Human activity patterns: A review of the literature for estimating time spent indoors, outdoors, and in transit. Proceedings of the Research Planning Conference on Human Activity Patterns, EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory. EPA/600/4-89/004: Las Vegas, NV.

Panksepp, J. (1998), Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford University Press: New York, N. Y.

Phelps, E. A. (2006), “Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala”, Annu Rev Psychol 57: 27–53.

Poffenberger, A. T. y B. E. Barrows (1924), “The feeling value of lines”, J Appl Psychol 8(2): 187–205.

Quinsey, V. L., M. Ketsetzis, C. Earls y A. Karamanoukian (1996), “Viewing time as a measure of sexual interest”, Ethol Sociobiol 17(5): 341–354.

Ritterfeld, U. y G. C. Cupchik (1996), “Perceptions of interiors of spaces”, J Environ Psychol 16(4): 349–360.

Russell, J. A. (2003), “Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion”, Psychol Rev 110(1): 145–172.

Rutherford, H. J. V. y A. K. Lindell (2011), “Thriving and surviving: Approach and avoidance motivation and lateralization”, Emotion Review 3(3): 333–343.

Sagan, C. y A. Druyan (1992), Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors. Ballantine: New York.

Shimojo, S., C. Simion, E. Shimojo y C. Scheier (2003), “Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference”, Nat Neurosci 6(12): 1317–1322.

Shizgal, P. (1997), “Neural basis of utility estimation”, Curr Opin Neurobiol 7(2): 198–208.

Silvia, P. J. y C. M. Barona (2009), “Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference”, Empir Stud Arts 27(1): 25–42.

Skov, M. y O. Vartanian (2009), Neuroaesthetics. Baywood: Amityville, N. Y.

Stamps, A. E. (1999), “Physical determinants of preferences for residential façades”, Environ Behav 31(6): 723–751.

Sternberg, E. M. y M. A. Wilson (2006), “Neuroscience and architecture: Seeking common ground”, Cell 127(2): 239–242.

Taylor, K. S., D. A. Seminowicz y K. D. Davis (2009), “Two systems of resting state connectivity between the insula and cingulate cortex”, Hum Brain Mapp 30(9): 2731–2745.

Van Hoesen, G. W., R. J. Morecraft y B. A. Vogt (1993), “Connections of the monkey cingulate cortex”, in B. A. Vogt y M. Gabriel The Neurobiology of the Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus: A Comprehensive Handbook. Birkhäuser: Boston, M. A., pp. 249–284.

Vartanian, O. y J. C. Kaufman (2013), “Psychological and neural responses to art embody viewer and artwork histories”, Behav Brain Sci 36(2): 161–162.

Vartanian, O. y V. Goel (2004), “Neuroanatomical correlates of aesthetic preference for paintings”, Neuroreport 15(5): 893–897.

Vessel, E. A., G. G. Starr y N. Rubin (2012), “The brain on art: Intense aesthetic experience activates the default mode network”, Front Hum Neurosci 6: 66.

Weber, R. (2012), “Introduction to the special issue: Aesthetics and design”, Empir Stud Arts 30(1): 3–6.

Wiesmann, M. y A. Ishai (2011), “Expertise reduces neural cost but does not modulate repetition suppression”, Cogn Neurosci 2(1): 57–65.

Winston, J. S., J. O’Doherty, J. M. Kilner, D. I. Perrett y R. J. Dolan (2007), “Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness”, Neuropsychologia 45(1): 195–206.

Yu, C. et al. (2011), “Functional segregation of the human cingulate cortex is confirmed by functional connectivity based neuroanatomical parcellation”, Neuroimage 54(4): 2571–2581.

Yue, X., Vessel, E. A. e I. Biederman (2007), “The neural basis of scene preferences”, Neuroreport 18(6): 525–529.

Zysset, S., O. Huber, E. Ferstl y D. Y. von Cramon (2002), “The anterior frontomedian cortex and evaluative judgment: An fMRI study”, Neuroimage 15(4): 983–991.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.

Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787