Encender la reciprocidad indirecta en un experimento de campo a gran escala
Resumen
Powering up with indirect reciprocity in a large-scale field experiment
A defining aspect of human cooperation is the use of sophisticated indirect reciprocity. We observe others, talk about others, and act accordingly. We help those who help others, and we cooperate expecting that others will cooperate in return. Indirect reciprocity is based on reputation, which spreads by communication. A crucial aspect of indirect reciprocity is observability: reputation effects can support cooperation as long as peoples’ actions can be observed by others. In evolutionary models of indirect reciprocity, natural selection favors cooperation when observability is sufficiently high. Complimenting this theoretical work are experiments where observability promotes cooperation among small groups playing games in the laboratory. Until now, however, there has been little evidence of observability’s power to promote large-scale cooperation in real world settings. Here we provide such evidence using a field study involving 2,413 subjects. We collaborated with a utility company to study participation in a program designed to prevent blackouts. We show that observability triples participation in this public goods game. The effect is over four times larger than offering a $25 monetary incentive, the company’s previous policy. Furthermore, as predicted by indirect reciprocity, we provide evidence that reputational concerns are driving our observability effect. In sum, we show how indirect reciprocity can be harnessed to increase cooperation in a relevant, real-world public goods game.
Key words: Evolutionary game theory, experimental economics.
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Andreoni, .J, Petrie, R. (2004), “Public goods experiments without confidentiality: A glimpse into fund-raising,” J Public Econ 88(7): 1605–1623.
Andreoni, J., Bernheim, B. D. (2009), “Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects,” Econometrica 77(5): 1607–1636.
Ashraf, N., Bandiera, O., Jack, K. (2012), “No margin, no mission? A field experiment on incentives for pro-social tasks,” Harvard Business School Working Papers. Available at www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/download.aspx?name=12-008.pdf. Accessed April 20, 2013.
Axelrod, R. (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.
Ayres, I., Raseman, S., Shih, A. (2009), Evidence from Two Large Field Experiments That Peer Comparison Feedback Can Reduce Residential Energy Usage. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Bateson, M., Nettle, D., Roberts, G. (2006), “Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting,” Biol Lett 2(3): 412–414.
Berger, U. (2011), “Learning to cooperate via indirect reciprocity,” Games Econ Behav 72(1): 30–37.
Bertrand, M., Karlan, D., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., Zinman, J. (2010), “What’s advertising content worth? Evidence from a consumer credit marketing field experiment,” Q J Econ 125(1): 263–306.
Bolton, G. E., Katok, E., Ockenfels, A. (2005), “Cooperation among strangers with limited information about reputation,” J Public Econ 89(8): 1457–1468.
Brandt, H., Sigmund, K. (2006), “The good, the bad and the discriminator— errors in direct and indirect reciprocity,” J Theor Biol 239(2): 183–194.
Burnham, T., Hare, B. (2007), “Engineering human cooperation,” Hum Nat 18(2): 88–108.
Carlton, D. W., Perloff, J. M. (1994), Modem Industrial Organization. New York: HarperCollins.
Cela-Conde, C. J., Ayala, F. J. (2007), Human Evolution: Trails from the Past. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Choi, J. K., Ahn, T. K. (2013), “Strategic reward and altruistic punishment support cooperation in a public goods game experiment,” J Econ Psychol, 35: 17–30.
Choi, J. K., Bowles, S. (2007), “The coevolution of parochial altruism and war,” Science 318(5850): 636–640.
Chupka, M. W., Earle, R., Fox-Penner, P., Hledik, R. (2008), Transforming America’s Power Industry: The Investment Challenge 2010–2030. Washington: The Edison Foundation.
Churchland, P. S. (2012), Braintrust: What Neuroscience Tells Us About Morality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cornelissen, G., Dewitte, S., Warlop, L. (2011), “Are social value orientations expressed automatically? Decision making in the dictator game,” Pers Soc Psychol Bull 37(8): 1080–1090.
Costa, D. L., Kahn, M. E. (2010), Energy Conservation” Nudges” and Environmentalist Ideology: Evidence from a Randomized Residential Electricity Field Experiment. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Dasgupta, P. (2012), “Dark matters: Exploitation as cooperation,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 299: 180–187.
Dunbar, R. I. M., Marriott, A., Duncan, N. D. C. (1997), “Human conversational behavior,” Hum Nat 8(3): 231–246.
Ellingsen, T., Herrmann, B., Nowak, M. A., Rand, D. G., Tarnita, C. E. (2012), “Civic capital in two cultures: the nature of cooperation in Romania and USA,” Available at http: //ssrn.com/abstract=2179575. Accessed April 20, 2013
Ernest-Jones, M., Nettle, D., Bateson, M. (2011), “Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: a field experiment,” Evol Hum Behav 32(3): 172–178.
Fu, F., Hauert, C., Nowak, M. A.,Wang, L. (2008), “Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks,” Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 78(2 Pt 2): 026117.
Gneezy, U., Rustichini, A. (2000), “Pay enough or don’t pay at all,” Q J Econ 115(3): 791–810.
Haley, K. J., Fessler, D. M. T. (2005), “Nobody’s watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game,” Evol Hum Behav 26: 245–256.
Hardin, G. (1968), “The tragedy of the commons. The population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality,” Science 162(3859): 1243–1248.
Harrison, G. W., List, J. A. (2004), “Field experiments,” J Econ Lit 42(4): 1009–1055.
Helbing, D., Yu, W. (2009), “The outbreak of cooperation among success-driven individuals under noisy conditions,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(10): 3680– 3685.
Jacquet, J., Hauert, C., Traulsen, A., Milinski, M. (2011), “Shame and honour drive cooperation,” Biol Lett 7(6): 899–901.
Kandori, M. (1992), “Social norms and community enforcement,” Rev Econ Stud 59: 63–80.
Karlan, D., McConnell, M. A. (2012), Hey Look at Me: The Effect of Giving Circles on Giving. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Kathan, D., et al. (2011), Assessment of Demand Response and Advanced Metering: Staff Report. Washington: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
Kossmeier, S., Ariely, D., Bracha, A. (2009), “Doing good or doing well? Image motivation and monetary incentives in behaving prosocially,” Am Econ Rev 99(1): 544–555.
Lacetera, N., Macis, M. (2010), “Social image concerns and prosocial behavior: Field evidence from a nonlinear incentive scheme,” J Econ Behav Organ 76(2): 225–237.
Leimar, O., Hammerstein, P. (2001), “Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity,” Proc Biol Sci 268(1468): 745–753.
Levin, S. A. (2006), “Learning to live in a global commons: Socioeconomic challenges for a sustainable environment,” Ecol Res 21(3): 328–333.
Levitt, S. D., List, J. A. (2007), “What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world?,” J Econ Perspect 21: 153–174.
Linardi, S., McConnell, M. A. (2008), “Volunteering and image concerns,” California Institute of Technology Working Paper.
List, J. A., Berrens, R. P., Bohara, A. K., Kerkvliet, J. (2004), “Examining the role of social isolation on stated preferences,” Am Econ Rev 94(3): 741–752.
Luca, M. (2011) “Reviews, reputation, and revenue: The case of Yelp.com,” Available at http: //hbswk.hbs.edu/item/6833.html. Accessed April 20, 2013.
Manapat, M. L. & Rand, D. G. (2012), “Delayed and inconsistent information and the evolution of trust,” Dyn Games Appl 2: 401–410.
Manapat, M. L., Nowak, M. A., Rand, D. G. (2012), “Information, irrationality and the evolution of trust,” J Econ Behav Organ, in press.
Mani, A., Rahwan, I., Pentland, A. (2013), “Inducing peer pressure to promote cooperation,” Scientific Reports, in press.
Masuda, N., Ohtsuki, H. (2007), “Tag-based indirect reciprocity by incomplete social information,” Proc Biol Sci 274(1610): 689–695.
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Bakker, T. C. M., Krambeck, H. J. (2001), “Cooperation through indirect reciprocity: Image scoring or standing strategy?” Proc Biol Sci 268(1484): 2495–2501.
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Krambeck, H. J. (2002), “Donors to charity gain in both indirect reciprocity and political reputation,” Proc Biol Sci 269(1494): 881–883.
Milinski, M., Semmann, D., Krambeck, H. J. (2002), “Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’,” Nature 415(6870): 424–426.
Minosi, A., et al. (2003), “Intelligent, low-power and low-cost measurement system for energy consumption,” IEEE International Symposium on Virtual Environments, Human-Computer Interfaces and Measurement Systems. Washington: IEEE. pp 125–130.
Nakamura, M., Masuda, N. (2011), “Indirect reciprocity under incomplete observation,” PLOS Comput Biol 7(7): e1002113.
Nowak, M. A. (2006), “Five rules for the evolution of cooperation,” Science 314(5805): 1560–1563.
Nowak, M. A., Highfield, R. (2011), SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed. New York: Free Press.
Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., Sigmund, K. (2000), “Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game,” Science 289(5485): 1773–1775
Nowak, M. A., Sigmund, K. (1998), “Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring,” Nature 393(6685): 573–577.
Nowak, M. A., Sigmund, K. (1998), “The dynamics of indirect reciprocity,” J Theor Biol 194(4): 561–574.
Nowak, M. A., Sigmund, K. (2005), “Evolution of indirect reciprocity,” Nature 437(7063): 1291–1298.
Nowak, M. A., Tarnita, C. E., Antal, T. (2010), “Evolutionary dynamics in structured populations,” Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365(1537): 19–30.
Oakley, B., Knafo, A., Madhavan, G., Wilson, D. S., eds (2011), Pathological Altruism Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. (2004), “How should we define goodness?—reputation dynamics in indirect reciprocity,” J Theor Biol 231(1): 107–120.
Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. (2006), “The leading eight: Social norms that can maintain cooperation by indirect reciprocity,” J Theor Biol 239(4): 435–444.
Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y. (2007), “Global analyses of evolutionary dynamics and exhaustive search for social norms that maintain cooperation by reputation,” J Theor Biol 244(3): 518–531.
Ohtsuki, H., Iwasa, Y., Nowak, M. A. (2009), “Indirect reciprocity provides only a narrow margin of efficiency for costly punishment,” Nature 457(7225): 79–82.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pacheco, J. M., Santos, F. C., Chalub, F. A. C. C. (2006), “Stern-judging: A simple, successful norm which promotes cooperation under indirect reciprocity,” PLOS Comput Biol 2(12): e178.
Panchanathan, K., Boyd, R. (2003), “A tale of two defectors: The importance of standing for evolution of indirect reciprocity,” J Theor Biol 224(1): 115–126.
Panchanathan, K., Boyd, R. (2004), “Indirect reciprocity can stabilize cooperation without the second-order free rider problem,” Nature 432(7016): 499–502.
Pfeiffer, T., Tran, L., Krumme, C., Rand, D. G. (2012), “The value of reputation,” J R Soc Interface 9(76): 2791–2797.
Powell, K. L., Roberts, G., Nettle, D. (2012), “Eye images increase charitable donations: evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket,” Ethology 118(11): 1096–1101
Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenberg, D., Nowak, M. A. (2009), “Positive interactions promote public cooperation,” Science 325(5945): 1272– 1275.
Rand, D. G., et al. (2013), “Intuitive cooperation and the social heuristics hypothesis: evidence from 15 time constraint studies,” Available at SSRN: http: //ssrn.com/abstract=2222683.
Rand, D. G., Greene, J. D., Nowak, M. A. (2012), “Spontaneous giving and calculated greed,” Nature 489(7416): 427–430.
Rand, D. G., Nowak, M. A. (2009), “Name and shame,” New Sci 204(2734): 28–29.
Rege, M., Telle, K. (2004), “The impact of social approval and framing on cooperation in public good situations,” J Public Econ 88(7): 1625–1644.
Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J., Lockwood, K. (2006), “The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment,” Exp Econ 9(2): 79–101.
Rockenbach, B., Milinski, M. (2006), “The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment,” Nature 444(7120): 718–723.
Schulz, J. F., Fischbacher, U., Thöni, C., & Utikal, V. (in press) “Affect and fairness: Dictator games under cognitive load,” Journal of Economic Psychology (0),
Seinen, I., Schram, A. (2006), “Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment,” Eur Econ Rev 50(3): 581–602.
Semmann, D., Krambeck, H. J., Milinski, M. (2005), “Reputation is valuable within and outside one’s own social group,” Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57(6): 611–616.
Sigmund, K. (2010), The Calculus of Selfishness. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sommerfeld, R. D., Krambeck, H. J., Semmann, D., Milinski, M. (2007), “Gossip as an alternative for direct observation in games of indirect reciprocity,” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(44): 17435–17440.
Suzuki, S., Akiyama, E. (2007), “Evolution of indirect reciprocity in groups of various sizes and comparison with direct reciprocity,” J Theor Biol 245(3): 539–552.
Suzuki, S., Akiyama, E. (2007), “Three-person game facilitates indirect reciprocity under image scoring,” J Theor Biol 249(1): 93–100.
Tadelis, S. (2007), “The power of shame and the rationality of trust,” Available at http: //papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1006169. Accessed April 20, 2013.
Thompson, C. (2007), “Clive Thompson thinks: Desktop orb could reform energy hogs,” Wired Magazine 15(8),
Uchida, S., Sigmund, K. (2010), “The competition of assessment rules for indirect reciprocity,” J Theor Biol 263(1): 13–19.
Ule, A., Schram, A., Riedl, A., Cason, T. N. (2009), “Indirect punishment and generosity toward strangers,” Science 326(5960): 1701–1704.
US Committee on Technology (2011), A Policy Framework for the 21st Century Grid: Enabling Our Secure Energy Future. Washington: Executive Office of the President: National Science and Technology Council.
Walker, B., et al. (2009), “Environment. Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions,” Science 325(5946): 1345–1346.
Wedekind, C., Braithwaite, V. A. (2002), “The long-term benefits of human generosity in indirect reciprocity,” Curr Biol 12(12): 1012–1015.
Wedekind, C., Milinski, M. (2000), “Cooperation through image scoring in humans,” Science 288(5467): 850–852.
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.
Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787