Bekoff, M. (1994), “But is it research? What price interdisciplinary interests?”, Biology and Philosophy 9: 249-252.

Castrodeza, C. (2011), “Interdisciplinariedad y especialización”, Ludus Vitalis 19 (35): 197-200.

Diéguez, A. (2000), “¿Hubo siempre dos culturas?”, Contrastes 5: 43-60.

— (2006), “Más campos, menos fronteras. Especialización e interdisciplinariedad”, Paradigma 1: 30-31.

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001), “Three kinds of adaptationism,” in S. H. Orzack y E. Sober (eds.), Adaptationism and Optimality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 335-357.

— (2007), “Is it a revolution?”, Biology and Philosophy 22: 429–437.

Gould, S. J. y R. Lewontin (1979), “The spandrels of San Marcos and the panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptionist programme,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B205, 1161: 581-598.

Haig, D. (2007), “Weismann Rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation,” Biology and Philosophy 22: 415-428.

Jablonka, E. y M. J. Lamb (2005), Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Martínez Freire, P. (2011), “La interdisciplinar en la filosofía de la mente”, Ludus Vitalis 19 (35): 227-230.

Mayr, E. (1983) “How to carry out the adaptationist program?”, American Naturalist, 121: 324-333.

Pigliucci, M. y G. B. Müller (2010), Evolution. The Extended Synthesis, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

Sober, E. (1984/1993), The Nature of Selection, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Resnik, D. (1997), “Adaptationism: hypothesis or heuristic?”, Biology and Philosophy, 12: 39-50.

Richards, C. L., O. Bossdorf y M. Pigliucci (2010), “What role does heritable epigenetic variation play in phenotypic evolution?”, BioScience 60 (3): 232-237. Varmuza S. (2003), “Epigenetics and the renaissance of heresy,” Genome 46: 963-967.