¿Multiplicar los géneros o mover las especies? Una nueva propuesta taxonómica para la familia hominidae

Camilo J. Cela-Conde, Cristian R. Altaba

Resumen


To multiply the genus or to move the species? A new taxonomical proposal for the hominids family

Recent findings and analyses have enriched our knowledge of the human lineage, forcing us to question once more the taxonomy of hominids. On the one hand, new genera are proposed so as to accommodate recently discovered specimens. On the other, the generic position of early hominids has been changing with the purpose of avoiding paraphyletic groups. We argue that multiplying genera may not be the best solution to improve the taxonomy of the Hominidae. Accepting that any genus must be an adaptive, particular unit, we propose to apply a suggestion by Darwin for a new taxonomic convention, species germinalis, for classifying doubtful specimens of the human lineage without needing either to designate new genera or to switch taxa from one genus to another. The family Hominidae can, by this means, be classified in terms of four genera and three subfamilies.

 

Key words: Taxonomy, Philogenetics, genus, species, species germinalis, Paleoanthropology, Hominidae, Homininae, Preanthropinae, Australopithecinae.

 


Texto completo:

PDF

Referencias


White T.D., Suwa G., Asfaw B. (1994). “Australopithecus ramidus, a new species of early hominid from Aramis, Ethiopia.” Nature 371, 306-312.

Senut B., Pickford M., Gommery D., Mein P., Cheboi K., Coppens Y. (2001). “First hominid from the Miocene (Kuleino formation, Kenya).” C.R. Acad Sci. 332: 137-144. No obstante, Haile-Selassie sostiene que los Ardipithecus comparten muchos caracteres derivados con homínidos posteriores, por lo cual pertenecen a la familia Hominidae [Haile-Selassie Y. (2001). “Miocene hominids from the Middle Awash, Ethiopia.” Nature 412, 178-181.]

Leakey M.G., Spoor F., Brown F.H., Gathogo P.N., Kiarie C., Leakey L.N. yMcDougall I. (2001). “New hominin genus from eastern Africa shows diverse middle Pliocene lineages.” Nature 410: 433-440.

Wood B. y Collard M. (1999). “The human genus.” Science 284: 65-71.

Wood B. y Collard M. (1999). “The changing face of the Homo genus.” Evol. Anthrop. 8: 195-207.

Cela-Conde C.J., Aguirre E., Ayala F.J., Tobias P.V., Turbón D., Aiello L.C.,Collard M., Goodman M., Groves C.P., Clark Howell F., Pérez-Pérez A., Schwartz J.H., Serrallonga J., Strait D.S., Szalay F., Tattersall I., Wolpoff M.H. y Wood B. (2000). “Systematics of humankind.” Ludus Vitalis 13: 126-134.

Schwartz J.H., Collard M. y Cela-Conde C.J. (2001). “Systematics of ‘Humankind’.” Evol. Anthrop. 10: 1-3.

Wood B. y Brooks A. (1999). “We are what we ate.” Nature 400: 219-220.

Darwin C. (1871). The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. John Murray, Londres.

Michaux B. (1989). “Morphological variation of species through time.“ Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 38: 239-255.

Spaan A. Sondaar P.Y. y Hartman W. (1994). “The structure of the evolutionary process.” Geobios 27: 385-390.

Cronin J.E., Boaz N.T., Stringer C.B. y Rak Y. (1981). Tempo and mode inhominid evolution. Nature 29: 113-122.

McHenry H.M. (1994). “Tempo and mode in human evolution.” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 6780-6786.

Lieberman D.E. (2001). “Another face in our family tree.” Nature 410: 419-420.

Leakey L.S.B., Tobias P.V. y Napier J.R. (1964). “A new species of the genusHomo from Olduvai,” Nature 20: 7-9.

McHenry H.M. and Coffing K. (2000). “Australopithecus to Homo: transformations in body and mind.” Ann. Rev. Anthropol. 29: 125-146.

Simons E.L. (1972). Primate Evolution: An Introduction to Man’s Place in Nature. MacMillan, Nueva York.

Schwartz J.H., Tatersall I., y Eldredge N. (1978). “Phylogeny and classification of the Primates revisited.” Ybk Phys. Anthrop. 21: 95-133.

Szalay E.S. y Delson E. (1979). Evolutionary History of Primates. Academic Press, Nueva York.

Fleagle J.C. (1988). Primate Adaptation and Evolution. Academic Press, San Diego.

McKenna M.C. y Bell S.K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press, Nueva York.

Remane A. (1956). “Paläontologie und Evolution der Primaten.” En Primatologia, vol. 1, eds. H. Hofer, A.H. Schultz y D. Starck, pp 267-378. Karger, Basilea.

Martin R.D. (1990). Primate Origins and Evolution. A Phylogenetic Reconstruction. Chapman and Hall, Londres.

Kemp T.S. (1982). Mammal-Like Reptiles and the Origin of Mammals. Vol. 2: Mammals. Academic Press, Londres.

Gosliner T.M. y Ghiselin M.I. (1984). Parallel evolution in opistobranchgastropods and its implication for phylogenetic methodology. Syst. Zool. 33: 255-274.

Rosenberg A.L. (1981). “A mandible of Branisella boliviana (Platyrrhini, Primates) from the Oligocene of South America.” Int. J. Primatol. 2: 1-7.

Bieler R. (1992). “Gastropod phylogeny and systematics.” Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23: 300-338.

Mikkelsen P.M. (1996). “The evolutionary relationships of Cephalaspidea s.l.(Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia): a phylogenetic analysis.” Malacologia 37: 375-442.

Aiello L. y Collard M. (2001). “Our newest older ancestor?” Nature 410: 526-527.

El uso de un taxón con jerarquía de familia para el linaje humano se discutey defiende en: Cela-Conde C.J. (1998). “The problem of hominoid systematics, and some suggestions for solving it.” S. Afr. J. Sci. 94: 255-262.

Weischampel D.B. (1996). “Fossils, phylogeny, and discovery: a cladisticstudy of the history of tree topologies and ghost lineage durations.” J. Vert. Paleontol. 16: 191-197.


Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Revista semestral editada por el Centro de Estudios Filosóficos, Políticos
y Sociales Vicente Lombardo Toledano
de la Secretaría de Educación Pública,
la Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa y Edicions UIB de la Universitat de les Illes Balears.

Lombardo Toledano 51, Col. Ex-Hda. Guadalupe Chimalistac,
Del. Alvaro Obregón, C.P. 01050, México, D.F.
Tels. (5255) 5661-4679 y 5661-4987
Fax: (5255) 5661-1787