https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-02-09/world-health-organization-investiga-

tion-china-covid-explainer/13132710.

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00375-7.

Zhou, P., et al. (2020), “A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin”. Nature 579: 270-273.

Coutard, B. et al. (2020), “The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade”. Antiviral Res. 176: 104742.

Hoffmann, M. et al. (2020), “A multibasic cleavage site in the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 is essential for infection of human lung cells”. Mol. Cell 78: 779-784.

Fouchier, R. et al. (2013), “Gain-of-function experiments on H7N9”. Nature 500: 150-151; Fouchier, R. et al, 2013. Science 341: 612- 613.

https://www.nature.com/news/us-suspends-risky-disease-research-1.16192

Menachery, V. D. et a., (2015), “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence”. Nature Medicine 21: 1508-1513.

https://www.nature.com/news/engineered-bat-virus-stirs-debate-over-risky-re

search-%201.18787

Lin, C. (2020), “Why US outsourced bat virus research to Wuhan”. ISPSW Strategy Series: focus on defense and international security. Issue 689, April 2020 (http://www.ispsw.de). (https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741)

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/14/state-department-cables-warned-safety-issues-wuhan-lab-studying-batcoronaviruses/

Andersen, K.G., et al, (2020), “The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2”. Nature Medicine 26: 450-455.

Zhang, D. (2020), “Anomalies in BatCoV/RaTG13 sequencing and provenance”. Preprint (zenodo.org): https://zenodo.org/record/3987503#.Xz9GzC-z3GI

Zhang, B. (2020), “SARS-CoV-2 Could Come from a Lab - A Critique of “The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2” Published in Nature Medicine”. (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/sars-cov-2-could-come-from-labcritique-proximal-origin-billy-zhang articleId=6651628681431175168#comments-6651628681431175168&trk=public_profile_article_view

Yan L- M, et al. (2020), “Unusual features of the SARS-CoV-2 genome suggesting sophisticated laboratory modification rather than natural evolution and delineation of its probable synthetic route”. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4028830

Cornish, A. (2020), “Rebuttal to the Yan report”. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4035088

Ge, X.Y. et al, (2013), “Isolation and characterization of a bat SARS-like coronavirus that uses the ACE2 receptor.” Nature 503: 535-538. See also ref. 8.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/09/wuhan-laboratory-leak-covid-origin-theory-unlikely-says-who-team

Sorensen, B, et al. (2020), “The evidence which suggests that this is not a naturally evolved virus: a reconstructed historical aetiology of the SARS-CoV-2 spike” (https://www.minervanett.no/files/2020/07/13/TheEvidenceNoNaturalEvol.pdf). For an account of difficulties for publishing the paper see: https://www.minervanett.no/angus-dalgleish-birger-sorensen-coronavirus/the-fight-for-a-controversial-article/362519

Rasmussen, A.L. (2021), “On the origins of SARS-CoV-2”. Nature Medicine 27: 9.